it’s hard out here

August 25th, 2011

(read the book free online - read the Reddit AMA)

Imagine you live in a small apartment above a bookstore.

Like most bookstores, it has an area set aside for perusing novels and consuming refreshments where you can relax with a alluring and fragrant pile of books stacked in front of you.  The only sounds come from the soft mood music the establishment is piping in and the contented signs of other customers.  You’re free to evaluate each prospective purchase at your own leisure, languidly stroking their pages one-by-one, seeing if this one or that one’s spine has what you’re looking for attached to it.

No one who works there ever comes up and hassles you about hurrying up and buying something already, there’s an implicit pact between client and business – you’re free to lounge for as long as you’d like, but if you want the convenience of taking the book with you, a fee is required.

That’s really all you’re paying, a convenience fee.  Each book sits on the shelf open and waiting, shyly beckoning you with coyly designed covers and promising words – tempting you to pick them up, sit them in your lap, fall in love with them, and pay to take them home. But whether or not payment is rendered, you can still have your way with as many books as you want, regardless of whether or not you pay a single cent.

If you actually lived in an apartment above a bookstore, how often would you actually pay to take a book home if you could take your time with each and every book right then and there in the store?  Probably not very often if you could conveniently come and go whenever you wanted.  So it’s been a good thing for the publishing industry that very few people actually live above or abreast a bookstore.

Unfortunately for the publishing industry, and just about everyone who works for it except the authors themselves, the internet went and got itself invented – so the publishing industry is now in the process of becoming well and thoroughly screwed.

Publishing has always been a notoriously fickle business: Harry Potter was rejected by nine publishers, A Time to Kill by twenty-six. The Diary of Anne Frank was labeled “very dull,” and “a dreary record of typical family bickering, petty annoyances and adolescent emotions.”  George Orwell was told Animal Farm would never sell because “it is impossible to sell animal stories in the U.S.”

Before selling over 130 million copies worldwide, Chicken Soup for the Soul was passed on by over 100 publishing houses.  And it took Doctor Seuss’s first book twenty-seven publisher rejections before it finally found a taker.

Talk to any literary agent and they’ll tell you that publishing has always been an absolute crap-shoot.  If people inside the publishing industry themselves admit that “It’s an accidental profession, most of the time,” and that “people think publishing is a business – but it’s a casino,” how exactly does it make sense to argue that the current economic model isn’t hilariously broken?

The randomness of publishing wasn’t due to some inexplicable high variance, it was a result of the fact that most people in the publishing business have no fucking idea what a good book looks like.  Walk into any bookstore in American and start randomly plucking books off the shelf.  You’ll have to go through about a dozen before you find one that’s worth reading more than a few pages of.

But maybe the most absurd part of the process is that even if your book did manage to run the gauntlet – querying agents, getting one to bite, finally selling your manuscript to a publisher – there was still one massive trial you had to pass. Bookstores still have to order your book from the publisher, and for Barnes & Noble’s entire fiction department this order was controlled exclusively and entirely by one woman.

Ponder that for a moment.

Some nameless faceless entity, who probably ended up getting into the bookselling business only after she failed at actually producing art herself, would hold the life of your dream in her hands, adjust her reading glasses, maybe absentmindedly pet one of the fourteen or so cats, and render judgement.

Unsurprisingly, Barnes & Noble is a slowly sinking ship – it’s only a matter of time before it comes to rest at the bottom of the business ocean alongside Borders. But there’s good news, and hope out on the horizon. Because the thing is, pretty much no one actually lives above a bookstore.

The evolution of the alphabet is shrouded in mystery, although many archeologists accept the theory that the first instance of phonemes being broken down into discrete chalky semaphore occurred somewhere inside of the Levant and probably served as a code for the enslaved to communicate the means of freedom to each other.

Kind of like the modern hobo code, but somehow more profound.

Then comes what we know for sure – the printing press empowered the Protestant Reformation, as for the first time knowledge could be disseminated free from any authoritative oversight.  And now revolution is beating down the doors of oppression and autocracy in the Middle East, riding waves of electronic dissent that never could have formed without the dissemination of the Internet to nearly every corner of the globe.

Tweeting and Facebook didn’t cause any of these revolutions, they merely allowed them to coalesce inside societies with incredibly strict laws about public gatherings.

Along with authoritarian regimes, the ongoing Information Revolution now seems to be well on its way to tearing down the crumbling facade of the book publishing industry.   The flip side to that is that it’s being argued that “writing, as a profession, will cease to exist,” a conjecture which couldn’t be farther from the truth.  It’s perhaps one of the more absurdly short-sighted and alarmist statements ever made in the short history of modern literature.

The only thing that might cease to exist is many of the superfluous managerial and bureaucratic jobs in the publishing industry, as well we writing as a profession… that can make you a multimillionaire who has a tank parked on his damn lawn.  Not to single out Tom Clancy, his first dozen books or so were absolutely brilliant and firmly established the geopolitical military thriller as a genre – but the tail end of his career bears witness to just how absurd the publishing industry has become.

Instead of quietly going into retirement he leveraged his name out to a series of video games, which isn’t something you can really knock him for in and of itself.  But he also slapped his name on a series of incredibly crappy books, as well as what’s hopefully one final gawdawful book that he supposedly “co-authored.”  But if you’re at all familiar with Clancy’s earlier works, it becomes very readily apparent that Clancy didn’t contribute anything to that book other than maybe a plot roughly outlined on a cocktail napkin.

Or maybe on a one-hundred dollar bill, they’re probably interchangeable in the Clancy household.  And the publishing industry welcomed this misleading farce with open arms, because they knew all they needed was Clancy’s name slapped on something with pages attached to it.  It would sell, and they’d be able to roll in the dough it produced like greedy myopic pigs.

Ewan Morrison’s argument that writing is a dead profession because of the prevalence of e-books isn’t only short-sighted, it doesn’t even hold together logically.   He jumps from the fact that “most notable writers in the history of books were paid a living wage: they include Dostoevksy, Dickens and Shakespeare,” which has continued to the modern system of authors receiving advances against royalties – all the way to the idea that the reduced advances are going to send authors straight to early retirements because they can’t live on the royalties from past books alone.

Even discounting the fact that Dostoevsky’s desperate need for advances came as a result of his compulsive gambling, and that J.K. Rowling isn’t alone in being able to write her first book without any hope of an advance, even living on welfare in her particular case – it becomes readily apparent that Morrison’s line of reasoning is deeply flawed:

To ask whether International Man Booker prizewinner Philip Roth could have written 24 novels and the award-winning American trilogy without advances is like asking if Michelangelo could have painted the Sistine Chapel without the patronage of Pope Julius II. The economic framework that supports artists is as important as the art itself; if you remove one from the other then things fall apart.

Conflating Philip Roth’s career, which was spent living in a modern American city, with an artist living in 16th century Renaissance Italy is about as asinine as it gets. The artistic market and map to success for someone authoring books in 20th century America has next to nothing in common with trying to make it as a painter and sculptor hundreds of years ago – the fundamental  ideas of market and commerce were completely and utterly different.  The economic framework Morrison cites has been holding up the publishing industry, not the authors themselves.

Category: books, current affairs, e-books, news, publishing, terrorism, war on drugs | Tags: , , , , 8 comments »

8 Responses to “it’s hard out here”

  1. anonymous

    At least publishers have editors… you would benefit

    “which isn’t something you can really knock him for in and of itself, but also a series of incredibly crappy books with his ”

    TtD: In addition to editors Tom Clancy at his worst is much better than me, or almost anyone, at their best. But thank you kindly for the edit!

  2. James Canoy

    Great overview of what is transpiring.

    As a previous commenter pointed out “at least publishers have editors”. Of course this only matters for the first book as any marketable author would be able to use profits to employ several editors.

    There are pro’s and con’s to any upheaval. An additional benefit would be the removal of paper books as a destructive force on the worlds forests. An example of a negative would be the loss of all the jobs involved with the publishing effort such as editors, marketing, and paper mills.

    I was initially surprised by the music statistic until I considered of my own buying preferences. I am much more likely to buy an author who I have previously experienced than I am a random author with whom I am not acquainted. This is especially true when the music/video is fairly priced.

  3. Kieran McMahon

    I’d argue that editors are an important contributory factor in producing good literature, and that suggesting authors ‘pay to employ their own’ is not a satisfactory solution. How do authors know who’s good for them? Quality control of personnel at that level in publishing is also extremely good, the top editors at quality publishers are generally possessed of stellar intellects and rare instincts. What, also, about the artistic alchemy that arises from unlikely partnerships that an author might never choose for themselves? Or the capacity of publishing houses to develop talent, offering two and three book deals to young writers. It’s not efficient by any means and they don’t do it nearly enough but they DO still do it and I don’t see any digital equivalent. There’s also the risk of saturating the market with literature that nobody wants to read; without an effective forum to filter and the presence of powerful, artistically-concerned, players to champion particular writers (which again, doesn’t happen nearly enough in traditional publishing) people could be looking at oceans of literature with little idea of what to read first. I’m not suggesting for one minute that traditional publishing is the only way to do that, just that digital publishing has yet to find a satisfactory solution to a lot of these issues.

    TtD: I definitely think editors play an incredibly important role, but I don’t think someone should be able to make a living just by being an “editor.” It’s something experienced authors can easily do for each other – it’s not brain surgery or something that requires years of schooling and technical expertise to master. Authors can scratch each other’s back when it comes to editing, and finding alchemy.

    I’m not sure of a case when a publishing house has developed talent like that, the only story along those lines I heard from my agent back in the day when I was signed with him, was that Dan Brown’s publishing house was about to boot him because they thought each of his first few books had only sold around 10 million copies… turns out they’d only sold a CUMULATIVE ten million, and the president of the publishing house said if he’d realized that, Brown definitely would’ve gotten the book before he had a chance to write The Da Vinci Code.

    Plus whoever was supposed to be doing quality control for George RR Martin and the Hunger Games clearly shit the bed – the decline in quality in each of their successive novels is pretty dramatic. And that’s both my opinion, and the collective opinion of the Amazon reviews. But then I think Collins may have just been cribbing off Battle Royale and may never really have had a complete universe conceived in her head in the first place.

    It won’t happen instantaneously, but the internet is going to allow talented, skilled, and determined writers to self-organize and edit each other’s work and keep each other on track, like the old school drinking clubs with Hemingway and that whole crew. Might be a long way off, but it’s not impossible.

    And “oceans of literature with little idea of what to read first” sound like every bookstore I’ve ever gone into. Quality works will spread via word of mouth, or keyboard, like they always have.

  4. William McDuff

    I think there will be room for professional editors. I don’t think readers will know who the best are, but writers will, and use them. A new profession.

    Authors want to be writing, not editing, I think.

    TtD: Sure for the most part, but most talented writers enjoy reading the work of other talented writers and are perfectly capable of critiquing it.

  5. Geek Media Round-Up: June 29, 2012 – Grasping for the Wind

    [...] it’s hard out here: “”Traditional publishing never worked, it was an industry ruled by chance and blind luck. It’s demise will be the best thing that’s ever happened to authors as the royalty system is rearranged and bureaucratic fat is removed from the system.” [...]

  6. » Music and art

    [...] the bureaucrats who “manage” it all? There’s going to be a whole lot fewer of them, and this is what the copyright battles and the attempts to censor the internet are all about, of [...]

  7. Wannabe author

    As a wanna be author I have found it disappointing when I received rejection notices.

    Most of the time they are terse, short on words, and vanilla.
    I rarely know why I have been rejected.

    As for the editing, at my level, the total amateur, groups of us edit each others work as a way of getting better at spotting glitches in our own work.

    That it also allows us to cross germinate is wonderful.

    At this juncture though we who are the newbies are left with the lottery of trying for a physical book through a traditional publisher, or a bunch of numbers by going digital with Amazon.

    That is why I like Baen publishing, they give away previews and make their real money on physical publishing and dedicated repeat customers.

    My next submission will be with them.

    Good luck to all those like who dream, never quit dreaming.

    Wannabe.

  8. book publishing

    Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles
    as long as I provide credit and sources back to your webpage?
    My blog is in the very same area of interest as yours and my visitors
    would genuinely benefit from a lot of the information you provide here.
    Please let me know if this okay with you. Cheers!

    TtD: Go crazy with quoting and citing as much as you’d like, thanks for checking in!!


Leave a Reply



Back to top

Not Found

Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.